|
|
Post by maysamyounis on Mar 22, 2016 12:02:41 GMT
So, now this today media everywhere the news about FbI Vs. APPLE. There are many articles talks about this subject. So the basic idea Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating systems, circumventing several important security features, and install it on an iPhone during inversion, and which , this software which does not exist today.So the FBI want to control people Phone for Security. And also, FBI want encryption the code to see people privacy. But then in another hand, Apple refuse that and Apple argues that the hacking software the FBI wants it to write would act as a master Key” That can unlock anyone’s phone at any time.Because apple company said if make that software we will like cancer in people phone. Is ever right to take someone's privacy away for the purpose of security? Do you value privacy or security more? Is national security more Important than Individual right to privacy? Apple versus FBI: All Writs Act’s age should not bar its use theconversation.com/apple-versus-fbi-all-writs-acts-age-should-not-bar-its-use-55430 |
|
|
|
Post by mayurika98 on Mar 22, 2016 13:29:39 GMT
Even though I don't own an iphone I have seen many situations where my friends would find an iphone laying around and be able to unlock it even though there is a puncoolword on it. These type of acts are not too much to an extreme because they are jokes that friends play on each other, however if it starts to become serious and hackers start getting into phones, no one's personal information will be safe. Of course it is not right to take someone's privacy away for the purpose of security because that would be a selfish act. I myself like to keep most of my private information to myself. However if I knew that I was in dange r I would want to tell someone my situation for my protection.
|
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Mar 22, 2016 13:40:10 GMT
Imagine if someone can lock your phone (any phone) and they can see your private information. If I was in that situation, I would fend the person off from my private info. Even though security is important, what is the point of security if the one who's operating security can see one's private information? It's not right to take someone's privacy away for the purpose of security.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tharu on Mar 22, 2016 23:44:47 GMT
We could think about it in both ways, think about someone unlocking your phone and seeing all your personal information, such as your facebook, instragram, your images and everything. You would probably feel insecure, because your phone is your personal thing. But then when it comes to public security, maybe the FBI has to involve in people's privacy for the sake of the country. So we can't really judge FBI for that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jessica (Yeeun) Kim on Mar 23, 2016 7:39:54 GMT
It is good to keep our phone safe from our government. As you know, the news about FBI and Apple is very similar to one of the issues in Korea. Personally, I believe privacy is more important because I always want to keep my secret. However, in this case, I believe security is more important because this straightly relates to our national security.
|
|
|
|
Post by erickim on Mar 23, 2016 11:09:01 GMT
This is very similar to the law that government in Korea right now is trying to puncool on.. I think it's called "Preventing Terrorist" in English but althought it sounds like a law that will prevent any terrorism from happening but the law actually gives Government to freely check everybody's records. This can means that any text messages, etc. I think it's best to keep our privacy away from government. dumb park gun hae
|
|
toufiq
Junior Member
Posts: 86 
|
Post by toufiq on Mar 23, 2016 11:58:58 GMT
I think keeping an eye on people for security purpose is fine. It can be invading someone's privacy but what if that person is trying to hurt someone. Also this doesn't mean that FBI will watch everyone 24/7. I mean let's be real about this they don't have time for this. They will only go through this process if there is a threat. So if we don't allow this now, we might end up being the victim.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewcho77 on Mar 23, 2016 12:11:12 GMT
Some may say privacy is more important. Some may say security is more important. In this case I think that security is more important. The government mostly knows a lot about us. THEY EVEN HAVE OUR "FINGERPRINTS." Anyways, would you rather save millions of life or just keep your privacy. Privacy might be a personal information but safety comes first. If you are dead, what's the point of having facebook or instagram or a phone or other social medias.
|
|
